Microscopic Roof Leaks Destroy Fasteners And Insulation A routine roof moisture survey performed in 1993 resulted in the discovery of a mode of roof leakage I had never before observed nor dreamed of. The source was capillaries within a single ply membrane. Not only had the roof insulation become wet from these microscopic leaks, but the membrane was no longer as resistant to wind uplift. The shafts of many of the fasteners had rusted through, leaving only the fastener head and the stress plate on top of the edge of each sheet of membrane. In this article I will describe the project, my mission and how I discovered this source of leakage. The Project The 1,000,000 square foot warehouse had been constructed in Virginia in 1987 and was used to store dry goods. The structure consisted of a steel frame, steel bar joists, and metal roof deck. The configuration of the roof framing formed a series of ridges and valleys so that the roof deck sloped to provide positive roof drainage. The flutes in the roof deck were oriented parallel to the roof slope. The roofing consisted of a 1.75" thick layer of phenolic foam insulation and a mechanically attached single ply roof membrane. The membrane was a white, reinforced, 45-mils thick, calendared elastomeric sheet. This membrane had been installed by placing individual five-foot wide sheets over the board insulation and the edges of each sheet were secured with self-tapping screws and plates. The laps were heat welded. In 1991, approximately four years after the building had been constructed, the building owner observed that corrosion had formed at certain areas on the underside of the roof deck. An investigation of the corrosion revealed that it was severe, and that the phenolic foam insulation was the primary factor which caused the metal roof deck to corrode. The owner also learned that the catalyst for this corrosion was water. Therefore, the owner wanted to identify the source of the moisture. The Investigation First, the locations of active
roof leaks were obtained from personnel working in the warehouse and the
underside of the roof deck was examined to identify the locations where
the metal roof deck was corroding. A comparison of the leak locations
and locations where corrosion was evident revealed that active roof leakage
was not associated with a majority of the areas of deck corrosion.Next,
interior temperature and relative humidity were measured. This information
was evaluated and it did not indicate that wet insulation The next action taken was to conduct a moisture survey. Wet areas of insulation were found and fifteen insulation samples were obtained to confirm the findings of the capacitance-type moisture meter. As expected, wet insulation was found above those areas where the metal deck showed corrosion from the interior. Also, I found areas of wet insulation in other areas where there was no indication of metal deck corrosion at the interior. There was no doubt that the insulation was wet and laboratory analysis later revealed moisture contents ranging from 1,134% to 3.8%, by weight. The top surface of the metal deck was examined when insulation samples were obtained and there was no paint visible, only severe rusting at all 15 locations. I examined the membrane, the heat welded laps, and the flashings to find the source of the moisture entry. I was on my hands and knees looking for a membrane puncture. I probed seams looking for an open lap, inspected flashings for defects, and looked for evidence of previous membrane repairs. Some punctures were found, some defects were found in the laps and flashings, and there was evidence of previous repairs. However, these conditions were not present at a majority of the areas of wet insulation. What caused the insulation to become wet? Areas of wet insulation were found at high points in the roof where there were no penetrations and no visible defects.
My final action on the roof was to show the roofing contractor, an authorized applicator, where the insulation samples had been taken so permanent membrane repairs could be made. We discussed my findings to date. The lead mechanic explained that he had repaired many roofs in Virginia with this same membrane and had not observed any obvious punctures, open laps or manufacturing defects, only severe chalking, of the membrane. On one occasion he held a piece of the weathered membrane to the sun and observed pin holes through the membrane. Yes, this membrane was severely weathered and chalky. I held several of the membrane samples I had collected to the sun and-no pin holes. Perhaps I needed a more weathered sample. We cut another membrane sample from an area that the mechanic said had resembled other roofs he had repaired recently. The sample was cast to the sun and, again, no pin holes. We packed our tools and samples and headed home to North Carolina, discussing possibilities all the way. We had a microscope in our lab. We could examine the membrane under the microscope and we would then see if there were holes in the membrane. All the way home, we anticipated the outcome. The Source of Moisture The next day we took the most weathered piece of membrane and placed it under the microscope. The weathered surface looked like the Badlands I had seen in the Anza-Borrego Desert State Park in southern California. I could see parts of the strands of reinforcing fabric-but no pin holes. I turned the sample over and adjusted the focus. The smooth, unweathered surface showed some relief due to the reinforcing fabric, but no pin holes.
I began to experiment with green food dye placed on the weathered surface of the membrane samples and quickly saw the green dye appear 1/2" or 1" away. Water could readily travel through the membrane. I then realized that there were brown colored stains at the edge of many of the heat-welded seams. Were these rust stains? I placed green food dye on the surface of the membrane over a rusty stain and, with the aid of the microscope, watched a rusty spot about 1/2" away. Within a few seconds, the rusty color turned green. I picked away at the weathered surface to expose the reinforcing fabric on another sample and tried this experiment again. It was easy to see that the green food dye was traveling through the membrane by way of the capillaries in and adjacent to the reinforcing fabric.
Was water penetrating the weathered
surface of the membrane, entering the capillaries in and adjacent to the
reinforcing fabric, traveling to the edge of the membrane and then into
the insulation? Many samples had been taken over field fabricated seams,
where the reinforcing fabric did not extend to the edge of the sheet.
Exposed fabric edges occurred only at the end of the five-foot wide roll.
I could explain how water was entering the membrane and traveling within
the membrane, but how could this water pass through the membrane into
the insulation?
Another examination of the membrane samples revealed laps that also contained fasteners and stress plates. Some only contained the head of a fastener and the stress plate as the shaft of the fastener had completely rusted through. This was the answer! The outlet for the moisture was every 12" in the lap where the fastener punctured the membrane and the reinforcing fabric. That could also explain why there were rust stains adjacent to the membrane laps as mentioned above, and why many of the samples taken at seams were not secured. The shaft of the fastener had rusted through and the interior of the lap contained only a fastener head and a stress plate. I took one of the membrane samples, placing the lower portion of the lap in a pan of green food dye. I was careful to elevate the balance of the membrane so that only the fastener hole was in contact with the green food dye. I left the sample over night. The next morning the rusty edge of the lap was now green. Green spots were visible to the naked eye within approximately 6" of the fastener hole (See photograph 2) The source of the moisture had been found as shown on the accompanying drawing.
Additional Investigation Samples of the membrane were also tested for moisture absorption. A sample of newer membrane was obtained from a patch that had recently been installed. Samples of weathered membrane were obtained from the original installation of 1987. These were tested by submerging each sample in water for 24 hours, removing them from the water, surface drying each sample and obtaining the "wet" weight of each sample. The samples were oven-dried for 36 hours and re-weighed. Moisture content by weight was computed. The newer membrane sample showed a moisture content by weight of 2.7%. The weathered membrane samples showed moisture contents averaging 7.8% by weight. The thickness of the membrane was also checked using an optical comparator. The three-component membrane (surface layer, reinforcing and underlying layer) has a nominal thickness of 0.045 inches, according to the manufacturer. Measurements were taken at cross sections of the weathered membrane and at cross sections of the tab or underlying portion of this same membrane which had not been exposed to the weather. The average measurements of the samples examined are:
Within six years, the surface
layer had weathered from a thickness of 0.020" to an average thickness
of 0.013". Additionally, the surface of the membrane had weathered
to form crevices as shown in photograph #4. These crevices were deep enough
to expose reinforcing fabric. 10. (Top)
Another example of green food dye traveling through capillaries. Conclusions Moisture can readily wick through
some membranes and, if the surface becomes weathered or cut edges are
not adequately sealed, moisture can then enter and attack the fasteners
and insulation. The result can be damaged fasteners, thus reducing the
wind uplift resistance of the membrane, and wet insulation, thus reducing
the roof system's thermal efficiency. |